Replies to post #179237 on Liquidmetal Technologies Inc (LQMT)

[joshuaeyu]

If 106c is truly a joint entity between LQMT and Yihao (not Eon), then following can happen.

1. LQMT choose to call it LM106-C for their own (western) market. LM106-C is not bound to MTA.
2. Eon can care less about the formula name, they just call it Liquidmetal (in chinese) within their (eastern) market.

Yes, Toyota Japan and Lexus/Toyota US share the identical technology.

This scenario means Eon and LQMT will simply OBEY the geographic rule within the PLA. CE exclusion within PLA does not have to comply with section 5.1/2 exclusion. Exclusion entities in contract can be mutually exclusive from each other.

CE exclusion will simply block Apple from any access to Eon's technology (mostly the machines and Synthetic Zirconium......things that Materion/Engel failed to produce for high volume market).

Naturally, Lugee (as CEO of LQMT) will welcome Apple (but with leverage).


Yes, LQMT needs to earn their keep by SELLING into their own market (includes Apple).

This is called WIN WIN.