News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Nanotoday

08/28/19 11:16 AM

#141541 RE: KMBJN #141538

I agree. That guy/girl sounds like he/she has no idea what they’re talking about and any and all statements must be purely fictional. It’s just uncanny how accurate they’ve been.

There’s another simple explanation for why the company hasn’t been able to progress as quickly as they’ve stated, but seems to be difficult for some to acknowledge as even a slight possibility.

Isn’t it possible that this endeavor was set up to enrich those who hatched it? $98M is a pretty nice piece of change for 15 years of work without having to actually deliver a single credible result.

Maybe?

I was wondering, if they haven’t produced at kg scale, and they go out of business, what is the realistic negative impact for their “misleading” statements?



icon url

Nanotoday

08/30/19 11:38 AM

#141546 RE: KMBJN #141538

“...simplest explanation for the delays is that they had trouble making the 'cides reliably (and cost effectively?), and they never quite fully fessed up to that difficulty.”


I thinks there’s a simpler explanation which is they have not, and have never been, honest about their progress, results, technology...

I also believe there are significantly more examples of this explanation being true vs. simply chalking it up to “trouble making the ‘cides.”

But I also believe in quantum physics so I must be ignorant. The laws of physics are all just lies, right?

Bwahahahahahahaha!

Is tox done yet?

Bwa bwa bwahahahahahahaha!