"Not having an updated and accurate background check increases the danger of guns being in the hands of abusive or otherwise potentially dangerous person.
You didn't dispute any of that so will assume, for now, it's all reasonably reasonable, and fair.
In mine above i suggest (have said it more directly before) it is your gun culture which troubles me. Your gun culture, not guns. Toothpicks don't go into eyes without human intervention either.
Again, as i have said many times before, it is your gun culture, leading to your factual outlier position re gun accidents, gun murders, and mass killings, which concerns me.
You replied:
"You may not like guns, that is your right. You may not believe in God (nor do I), that is your choice. But if someone breaks into your home, the first two things you are going to do is: 1. CALL SOMEONE WITH A GUN TO SAVE YOU 2. PRAY THEY GET THERE IN TIME. Change my mind."
Looks you there are attempting to distract. Guns don't kill by themselves. We agree.
See above for my position on background checks. Full checks, utilizing fully and accurately updated history of every buyer. Relevant details only, of course. Domestic abuse? Psychological stability? Criminal convictions? Of course they, and other relevant details, change, but that's understood.
I'm not intent on changing your mind, just putting debating points.
What's your problem with closing all background check loopholes?
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
