News Focus
News Focus
icon url

cabos_tacos

07/26/01 12:26 PM

#10347 RE: dk76 #10346

dk, i beg to differ. big time. we are investors and more important, customers.
if they {mcbride] are going to put out half baked, baseless prs they OWE us follow up and explanations.
most of the issues that some of us question, mcbride started the ball rolling on. and thats a big period. period!

its unbelievable that u and alot of other people , here on these message boards and off will take this kind of crap.

do u take everyones word in life when they refuse to back up or finish what they say? i hope not.

a couple of examples.
he says they have exclusive patents. well prove it. or is his word good enough for u?
800 milllion dollar deal, 168 million in sales, 9 million in back orders.

well mcbride started all this. whats the status on these?.
i can undersstand the company not explaing everything they do. but if they are going to announce it [[on message boards by the way] they should be held accountable.
how can u not see this?



icon url

Madhatter

07/26/01 2:25 PM

#10356 RE: dk76 #10346

So DK, are you a supporter of putting a gag rule to RM on these boards? Do you know of a real company where an employee and major shareholder engages in message board posting?

icon url

TAfirehawk

07/27/01 12:02 AM

#10366 RE: dk76 #10346

Great post dk76, I am glad I clicked NEXT because I almost hit RESPOND right before reading your post and was going to say the exact same thing.

dk76...
It's interesting that many here seem to believe SEVU owes "us" an explaination on a number of issues. I'll admit, some of them may be valid, but are they worthy of a public announcement? If SEVU wants to be a real company, they won't stoop to responding to message board questions. If any of these issues are important enough to one/many shareholders (or potential shareholders), the parties should contact the company. If SEVU receives enough inquiries, they may deem it worthy of a formal announcement. If they refuse to comment, it may be enough to convince someone to sell or not invest in the company. That's the option of the individual investor, but certainly doesn't obligate the company to respond to every question.

I'm a shareholder with a reasonable number of shares. Personally, I'd rather not see the company waste their time engaging in the pissing match that takes place every day on message boards.


JMHO, TAfirehawk