News Focus
News Focus
icon url

sukus

08/05/19 7:15 AM

#238528 RE: exwannabe #238524

Ex, even with math, the percentage is too good to be true for optune.

Optune OS24: 12%.

Optune OS60: 13%.

Normally OS60 is less than OS24.

But in the case of Optune, OS60 is more than OS24. That math only means that Optune didn’t include attrition rate. Why there is no attrition between OS24 and OS60?

Consider DCVax-l.
DCvax-l OS88 at 12% is possible.

Because...
OS36 at 33% estimate
OS48 at 25% estimate
OS60 at 20% estimate

So it is possible to have 12% estimate at OS88 for DCvax-l.

It would be different story and impossible to claim OS88 at 12%, had it were only 11% at OS36.

So you see that with math, Optune calculation is still too good to be true. Why is that?

All my opinion.
icon url

flipper44

08/05/19 8:42 AM

#238530 RE: exwannabe #238524

You mean because of Novocure’s flawed design they were able to pretend they might have 13% alive at five years, when at most they likely had 7%. Novocure and the those at the FDA connected to it should be in serious trouble, imo, for spewing this trash science out to patients in the form of advertising. As far as your flawed analysis, you should know by now how they increased their censors to hide dead people. They knew exactly how to manipulate the KM curve. The KM is not a religion EX, but your unquestioning belief in its supposed invulnerability to tampering via censor games is unparalleled. Why don’t you get their complete actual number alive at five years, or even at four years, or even at three years? Oh, that’s right, they won’t provide it.