No one but a moral imbecile jumps to conclusions about one meeting and ignores the clear implications of the other meeting.
Whoa dude, you're the one jumping to conclusions. All politicians want dirt on there opponents. It just happens that Hillary was the only one that received any.
I'm not ignoring any thing. Yes they should have taken the meeting, and if anything came of it the FBI should be notified.
The clear implication is not conspiracy. It was clear that they wanted to know what they had. It's not like the Trump campaign paid a law firm, to pay a research company, to pay a foreigner to get a fake story from Kremlin sources.
Funny how a moral imbecile jumps to conclusions about one meeting and ignores the clear implications of the other meeting.
You should really pose this question to yourself, because I'm not the one ignoring anything.
You are ignoring the secret private meeting Clinton had with the person responsible for making any proprietorial decisions concerning His wife.
Classic OOJ right before your eyes. But with all your moral righteousness, you're going to disparage me for pointing it out.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
