Replies to post #69264 on UnifiedOnline Inc fka UOIP

[ice2014]

I understand about oral and en banc hearing on Chanbond’s appeal against Cisco’s partial win on one of the three patents.


But what’s about “Motion for Summary Judgement from the defendants” ? When is it taking place ?

[AllinFun]

The 13 as we discussed earlier have enough money to pay those extra costs to file this motion - as we said this motion is expensive to refrain from having a defendant file it after all of the prior court proceedings and waste time. They could very likely end up hurting themselves with the one by losing more leverage - or they already know where they stand with leverage outside of the Cisco claims which are by the way being appealed and now we finally have a date to go with that appeal. If they know they already have little to no leverage then this is just another stall tactic to throw mud at the wall hoping it sticks. I cannot think for a second the judge would grant this motion after all of the proof and proceedings showing the damages rendered for so many years.

Glad you stepped up my brother your creating a lot of buzz on tbe board and it's exciting. August is right around the corner and then we get info flowing on the Cisco appeal and if those claims are overturned im going to start selling a lot of things to load everything here.

[magnus_invest]

Cisco appeal is at stage 5 WOOT! WOOT!
http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/rules-of-practice/notices/Life_of_an_Appeal_Narrative_and_flowchart.pdf

Thank you dillythekid for finding the pacer.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT
717 MADISON PLACE, N.W.
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20439

PETER R. MARKSTEINER CLERK'S OFFICE
CLERK OF COURT 202-275-8000

18-1886 - ChanBond, LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc.
NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1-xNELgceOGXLg9CARuwUYM20Wtl3ShJY/view

Long UOIP,
~Magnus

[Goodbuddy4863]

Just updated The Pacer.

2ND MESSAGE FROM TOP.

I now put the new Reports right after the one naming the Patent Inventors.

Many thanks

[Goodbuddy4863]

Was this before I started doing the Pacer Reports?

I definitely enjoyed seeing this:

"Put simply, the settlement value of a case increases when a motion for
summary judgment is denied. Denial of summary judgment motions up
the ante in the litigation game."