Replies to post #232298 on NorthWest Biotherapeutics Inc (NWBO)

[maverick_1]

SAME OLDDDD tactics;;;; ALREADY RESPONDED:

[maverick_1 Thursday, 05/23/19 05:07:30 PM
Re: exwannabe post# 228765
Post #
228770
of 228773
Quote:
YOU CLAIM YOU HAVE PROFITED HERE BY SELLING OUT IN 2015,


EASY for you to ALWAYS put any poster on the defensive but here's MUD in your caked up eyes:

Quote:
maverick_1 Thursday, 08/04/16 01:42:18 AM
Re: 791branko post# 68459
Post # 68467 of 228767
Thank You Branko for taking the time from your busy schedule to share your views as the first portfolio manager to discover and unveil, misunderstood Northwest Biotherapeutics, being in the forefront of the immuno-oncology space to the investment world via mainstream Forbes:
Including to reference:
http://www.forbes.com/sites/kenkam/2015/03/06/northwest-biotherapeutics-is-a-best-idea/#229010157b3e.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/kenkam/2016/03/23/northwest-bio-is-down-but-not-out/#73e167ce596e

Those views of mine were honed thru two intense decades of professional stock analysis and portfolio manager experience being on the front lines of the investment process beginning with institutional presentations on investing in Japan in the early 1970's to dealing with uncovering hidden value in misunderstood $multi bln multi national industrials to uncovering emerging technology growth co's in the 80's; as well as memorable experiences dealing with successful hedge fund managers on both the long and short side, to even being responsible for a successful proxy contest in unseating a CEO founder of a technology co.

I continue my dedication as a private investor due to being a creature of the markets.I know of no other business that is so challenging and keep one enraptured... if one can keep pace with dynamic change.

Clearly we are dealing with a highly unusual investment vehicle from many perspectives.[color=red] I was fortunate in exiting NWBO shares the Summer of 2015 due to a strict investment discipline in dramatically reducing equity exposure from a portfolio manager's perspective overruling my love of a stock analyst's perspective due to the confluence of these factors: the longest and most profitable biotech run; the dramatically slowing of the world's most important consumer, the Chinese consumer, in a world of anemic to non existent growth courtesy of the draconian dislocations still plaguing the world caused by the US subprime mortgage exported financial crisis[/color]. And I was fortunate in the opportunity to accumulate a large NWBO position below 70 cents. No one can time stock market bottoms consistently. I've only done that a few times.

I, like most, are hopeful NWBO has made lots of progress during this period to share and update it's shareholders soon. With a clearly fortified team found by this Sherlock along with some of these key issues, a lot has happened behind the scenes which one might find interesting: (Tried to be selective here:)
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=124101297
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=123741359
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=124099318
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=123699010
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=123691917
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=123564913
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=123747658

Branko, we welcome your participation and feedback.

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=124302143

The above was posted just 2 days ago:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=148933039

WASTE OF TIME: yearS of putting up with exwan

The problem with message boards: lots of posters with lots of cross currents AND
SNIPPETS here and there versus missing FOUNDATIONAL ELEMENTS to build on versus
being jerked around by bully pulpits either short or LONG.
So the odds of keeping a clear mind on top of CEO's Linda Powers needed SILENCE or
recent COMING OUT has made it EXCEEDINGLY HARD for 99%.
I had a much EASIER time working as a PROFESSIONAL stock analyst/portfolio manager than
dealing with this in my mid 60's to NOW with INCONGRUITY.DIFFERENT STROKES FOR DIFFERENT STROKES

maverick_1 Member Level Wednesday, 05/17/17 08:10:18 AM
Re: A deleted message
Post #
117845
of 232298
The Definitive Proxy Statement last Dec 2016 doesn't even indicate under Proposals to Consider at Dec 22, 2016 Annual Shareholders Meeting

AND those that ATTENDED did not post any commentary about a reverse stock split:
Quote:
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON DECEMBER 22, 2016
Dear Stockholder:
You are hereby cordially invited to attend the 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Northwest Biotherapeutics, Inc., (the “Company”) which will be held on December 22, 2016 at 10:00 a.m. (local time) at the offices of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, 1050 Connecticut Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20036, and any adjournments or postponements of the annual meeting.
We are holding the Annual Meeting for the following purposes:
1. To elect two members to our Board of Directors to serve as Class I directors for a term of three years;
2. To ratify the appointment of Marcum LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2016; and
3. To act upon such other matters as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment thereof.
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1072379/000117494716003448/c454145_def14a.htm

AND IMUC was in similar straits (delisting) Sept 2016 that NWBO faced with NASDAQ delisting and IMUC choose a 1 for 40 Reverse Stock Split https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=124936319
ALL of which as expected NWBO obviously did not consider and opting for OTC.OB versus Pink Sheets to further it's legal case

So UNLESS there is a future PR with 6 weeks notice on convening a Special Shareholders Meeting we are dealing in pure speculation

IF one wants to pursue this tack come up with specific reasons vs Fear Mongering as to why NWBO would do a reverse stock split!

Here is IMUC's April 28, 2017 (6 week window) for a June 16 2017 Proxy Annual Shareholder's meeting seeking for a doubling in authorized shs:
https://seekingalpha.com/filing/3522144

DIFFERENT STROKES FOR DIFFERENT FOLKS

maverick_1 Member Level Wednesday, 05/17/17 02:43:12 PM
Re: maverick_1 post# 117845
Post #
117990
of 232298
Rudimentary InCorporation BASICS dismissed by ALL those investors? on IMPENDING Reverse Stock Split.

The mere Basics were not even considered!!: The factS as portrayed in this snapshot of it's March 31, 2017 Balance Sheet:
Quote:
Stockholders' equity (deficit):
Preferred stock ($0.001 par value); 40,000,000 shares authorized; 0 shares issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively - -
Common stock ($0.001 par value); 450,000,000 shares authorized; 185,511,822 and 157,028,270 shares issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively
https://seekingalpha.com/filing/3551762?uprof=44

ALL the Basic 101 Clues are there for your answer.
IF you still can't resolve your OWN dilemna's with this............truly hopeless and underscores the lack of basics of investing/corporate governance etc.

And that's probably why few here sold with the ONDRA AFFAIR.... too complex of a mental undertaking, let alone lacking in investment experience IMHO.

Even IF the shs reach hypothethically $1.00 the most NWBO could do NOW (or even at yrend 2016) is a 1 For 2 Reverse Stock Split to get the shares in this example up to AN INSUFFICIENT $2 level. Well over $5 is PREFERRED especially for penny stocks.

To issue more than a 1 for 2 Reverse Stock Split NWBO would have to convene a shareholder meeting with the proposal to authorize many more shares than it's current limit of 450 mln shs company. AND it must be sent out at least 6 weeks BEFORE that shareholder's meeting! So a Press Release would be the first indication.

So I ask where is the logic from those handful of supposedly experienced posters/investors? based on ACTUAL circumstances NWBO faces!!!

It's a sad day to have to demonstrate the above for those investors? lacking the basics and needing to Go Back to Finance101!

Class dismissed!

Clearly a case of: Putting the cart BEFORE the horse!! OR FEAR MONGERING or BOTH!

ALL of the above has to take place FIRST and then I would consider and concur with Bioselect's remarks titled Fear of r/s are superstitionhere: https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=131418706

Way too much NONSENSE with fragmentary and deficient short posts... regression!

BTW TWO recently FAILED Reverse Stock Splits: obviously IMUC and TPIV( a 10% owner has a long rap sheet of being a stock promoter etc)

DIFFERENT STROKES FOR DIFFERENT FOLKS