News Focus
News Focus
icon url

trader59

06/06/19 8:47 PM

#153129 RE: tchalla #153126

And the imagination continues to run wild.

You're tossing in a "cause and effect" that isn't real. You really think you can buy 300M shares of a company, "gift" back 250M of them, and sell the other 50M for more than the 300M would be worth if you sold them intelligently during a pump?? Really??

The other thing is, if you "assume" he's going to do something "legit" with the company (and I'm laughing as I type that) and bring value to it, giving stock away is, as stated earlier, really dumb and ridiculous to even "speculate" that it might be what his plan is.

You don't buy common stock from the public market/OTC that you don't expect to sell. Nobody believes he's buying shares out of his own pocket that he doesn't need in order to give them back to the company, that's not even a good OTC narrative.
icon url

surfkast

06/06/19 9:25 PM

#153133 RE: tchalla #153126

Any comments on what the SS is is bullshit.
No updates since 2016?

Not rocket science.

It is a total scam with pumpers looking more stupid by the minute.
icon url

trader59

06/06/19 10:23 PM

#153141 RE: tchalla #153126

well, considering that the company has not authorized the issuance of shares in two years



Read through that last quarterly they released at the massive amount of convertible debt and "discount to the market" terms. Then go to Yahoo finance and pull up the historical price quotes and volume for the stock for the last 5 years. Start the day of the de-registration statement (12/19/2017) - after which those notes could convert with the CEO's/Boards blessing and nothing more - look through the volume day by day and tell me that at least some of that volume wasn't put up by those noteholders who were quite satisfied with an 80 - 100% gain on the conversions, even if it took awhile to dream up a pump and move the stock at $0.0001 or $0.0002.