Replies to post #4489 on Medical World News

[wow_happens28]

Preciouslife1, I am diabetic. I went to a doctor for it in 2000.

My first pill was Metfromin. Metformin blocks the bodily process of turning healthy fats, like nuts, avacadops, meat and fish into glucose. Not being over weight i had to eat more carbohydrates for energy, and Type 2 diabetes is basically an allergy to high dense carbs, like wheat, rice potatoes and beans. So, my blood sugars went up.

Next, in 2004 the ADA< CDC or whoever lowered the acceptable levels of LDL cholesterol by 30 points(that was huge), same year Litigator came out in mass(wasn't that convenient for the drug companies. Well, statins raise blood sugars as well, so my diabetes got worse.

Then a year and a half ago I got on the Paleo diet, now on Keto. My doctor seemed alarmed. I was not on a statin, but a natural one, red rice yeast(so called natural, but over the counter). His first comment without seeing my blood results was that he might have to get me back on statins.

Diabetes is a listed cause of dementia. So statins, even if they work, which they don't, will make me more at risk for dementia because it raises my blood sugars.

Am I living in the twilight zone where doctors are here to kill me?

But, hey, some surgeries, joint replacements, etc are great. Just pills and vaccines are my concern.

[wow_happens28]

JAMA Study: Flu Shots Are Killing Elderly Citizens In Record Numbers

https://newspunch.com/jama-study-flu-shots-killing-elderly/

Senior citizens are being killed in record numbers as a result of the flu vaccine, a disturbing JAMA study has found.

According to data collected by the study, 60 percent of people aged 65-years and over have a massively increased risk of death if they receive the flu shot.

Sharyl Attkisson, former investigative journalist for CBS, says the study highlights how those vaccines may actually be killing lives rather than saving them.

Inquisitr.com reports: In her blog, Attkisson cites a buried JAMA study from almost a decade ago which showed that there was no improvement in mortality rates among senior citizens with a flu vaccine, even after greatly increased vaccination rates. The study “got little attention,” she says, “because the science came down on the wrong side.”

Whereas the researchers had set out to prove that the push for massive flu vaccination would save the world, the researchers were “astonished” to find that the data did not support their presupposition at all. The data actually shows that deaths increased, not decreased, among seniors following vaccination.

Johns Hopkins scientist, Peter Doshi, Ph.D., issued a report in the prestigious British Medical Journal, according to NewsLI, asserting that the CDC policy of routinely recommending the flu vaccine is being based on “low quality studies that do not substantiate claims.”

He says there is no evidence that the vaccine reduces deaths among senior citizens. Interestingly, Doshi cites an Australian study which found significant risks for children as well, stating that “one in every 110 children under the age of five had convulsions following vaccinations in 2009 for H1N1 influenza.”

During the drug trials for the Fluzone flu vaccine, 23 seniors out of 3,833 died after receiving the shot, according to the drug’s package insert, reported by Health Impact News. Another 226 experienced “serious adverse effects.” The manufacturer denies any connection between the deaths and the flu vaccine.

There appears to be growing public skepticism that the flu vaccine is as beneficial as the experts say, according to an earlier Inquisitr report.

The level of doubt is strongly correlated to the incidence of accounts of research fraud in the vaccine industry, an industry which makes billions of dollars of profit every year.

Often when an article about the dangers of a vaccine comes out, there are people who write in to tell about a family member who was harmed by the vaccine, and the flu vaccine for senior citizens in no exception.

A number of people have written to report that their grandmother, or uncle, or brother died shortly after getting a flu shot, sometimes after receiving their first ever such shot.

Their stories are frequently minimized, yet the government pays out more compensation from the flu vaccine than any other vaccine.

Despite this, it is increasingly expected that every senior citizen line up for their annual flu shot.

A nursing home near Atlanta, Georgia, now reports a devastating outcome to such a policy, according to Health Impact News. All of the residents of the Hope Assisted Living & Memory Care were given a flu vaccine on Friday, November 7. Every one of the senior citizens developed an immediate fever. Within the week following, five of them died. The source reports that the facility’s typical pattern is one or two losses every six months, frequently due to Alzheimer’s.

Questions must be asked, then, such as: do the benefits of getting a flu vaccine outweigh the risks, especially among vulnerable senior citizens? Or would they be better off choosing to reject the shot? Who benefits if evidence showing the harm of the vaccine is buried?

And what would be the motive for fabricating evidence of harm if none exists? If the facts are as solid as some insist, then why do they seem to be threatened by the data being challenged? Shouldn’t truth be able to stand up under scrutiny?