InvestorsHub Logo

th6565

05/19/19 9:24 AM

#46033 RE: prototype_101 #46031

Proto, can you tell more about “chips per quarter”? I do not understand the meaning of said phrase.

th6565

05/19/19 9:24 AM

#46034 RE: prototype_101 #46031

Proto, can you tell more about “chips per quarter”? I do not understand the meaning of said phrase.

tedpeele

09/10/23 8:29 AM

#156730 RE: prototype_101 #46031

Proto, just after 2019 ASM:


Where is the five year plan?!!!

Wise, wager that LWLG already has substantial contracts ("we haven't gone public about sales yet") but they are all under NDA and have considerable conditions precedent on technical milestones that need to be met before proceeding along with the deals. By the time LWLG announces these deals, we will probably have already figured out who some of the players are.

Wise, I've thought likewise ever since the Investor Summit Interview, I watched and listened very closely to Dr Lebby's interview several times and I got the distinct impression that he was dying to tell us something that he couldn't, so we had to be able to read between the lines




ASM video at 44:44 Dr Lebby discussing wafer capacity and he uses the term "chips per quarter", and he speaks of weekly lots being run off this wafer line, and how LWLG is actually able to achieve quite substantial level of production of these wafers/chips, in fact they have bench marked their capacity with existing competitive modulator chip suppliers and LWLG is comparable to them, and there is no expensive differentiated equipment needed, it's all standard equipment being used




Ok, so in relation to the material systems Gen 1, Gen 2, and perhaps a Gen 2A are in play currently

So for these reliability testings it would not surprise me that they are performing all tests with all of the existing material systems in use since the 50Gbs device was unveiled, just a guess really, but seems to me they are churning out tons of wafer/chips at this point, so I get the idea there is LARGE SCALE testing going on, and if I wanted to dot my i's and cross my t's without wasting time but gaining maximum applicable knowledge, assuming necessary resources are available, I think I would shadow the reliability testings on all existing variations of material systems, that way if there were any inconsistencies to arise/deal with, certain information may be relevant to solving a puzzle from one of the material system variants