Replies to post #83133 on Vystar Corp (VYST)

[BigBadWolf]

amusing but just more BS

[CyberJ]

Legal challenges here, keep getting refuted over,& over-by,VYST

Twitter replies have shown over and over that the legal notions strongly asserted here have been nothing more than opinions without any legal knowledge.

[doogdilinger]

Well since VYST definitely is a full SEC Reporting Company and VYST is definitely not suspending or eliminating its SEC reporting obligations, that stupid 701 Rule is totally inapplicable here, and is yet another laughable example of the never ending distorted bs constantly and repetitively inferred/suggested/stated as supposedly applicable here, when the FACT is it isn't lmfao>>>

Rule 701 may be used only by an issuer that is not subject to the reporting requirements of Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act

If an issuer which is currently a reporting company properly suspends or eliminates its reporting obligations under the Exchange Act, either pursuant to a statutory provision or a SEC rule, it may thereafter rely on the exemption provided by Rule 701 if the issuer satisfies the necessary conditions set forth below