Replies to post #565502 on Mr Cooper Group Inc fka COOP

[Major_Bankz]

I'm UPSET because I have both 19 and 22 evenly and don't care if 19 gets 0. just for your info. All I want is for the PAYOUT to be given ASAP.

[Major_Bankz]

Although i have both 19 and 22, of course I don't want my 19 be diluted, but bird in the hand is always better as u know. U cant be too GREEDY sometimes. IMO

[Mr_Simpson72]

Exactly LG! Kudos to Alice... oh BTW at no cost to anybody here.

[mordicai]

In the prayer for relief, shouldn't she have explicitly asked for the return of 1.4 million shares of wmih given to the underwriters to be redistributed to escrow holders? In addition, the return of any shares distributed to the underwriters from the disputed escrow reserve? Her filing may finally reveal if there is anything left that will be distributed to escrow holders.

[stoxjock]

Completely Agree with You... Those who are against BOPFAN are spline-less and short-sighted...

I have both Class 19 Preferred and a TON of Class 22 Commons... I will still Support BOPFAN in this because for me the Principle is much more important than making a few more bucks here or there...I am Sick & Tired of How Brian Rosen Has colluded with William Kosturos and Creditors time and again in deceiving the Court IN EVERY ILLEGAL WAY POSSIBLE...AND Unfortunately M Willingham HAS COLLUDED with Them instead of 'Safeguarding Equity Interests"...

I want Brian Rosen Disbarred for Good and PUT In JAIL, ALONG WITH WILLIAM KOSTUROS, The Underwriters AND The TAB, who have 'Perpetrated' this "BK FRAUD" Upon this Court and UPON US.

[BBANBOB]

Large I agree 100% and as well I WILL gladly do my part to SUPPORT OUR/Her cause here.

If this stipulation is not overturned it would/could cost all of us here far more than is being suggested as far as donations.

Had we had other counsel do this on contingency it would have cost far more then .10 per P or .0025 per K

[ItsMyOption]

Large Green, re Objection letter by CSNY? BOPFAN I feel she did a great job in her Objection. I do not feel this will delay any possible disbursement to other. Any $$ disbursement to Underwriters can be kept in a fund until Judge makes ruling.

I did notice it is Objection and not a Motion not sure why as a Judge does not need to rule on Objection only a Motion.

If her Objection does cause any delay I am for it as it bring a lot of concerns many of us have with WMI-LT Trustee and Estate Managers - I do not trust them. We should all worry about other deals the Managers of the Estate made that ARE NOT IN OUR BEST INTEREST!

I feel COOP need to update in 8-K form material events that seem to be going on like the Washington Mutual Trust 2001 is listed as sub yet no 8-K disclosure. I have written many emails to IR manager Kenneth Posner about this with cc to SEC and never get any response. SOMETHING IS GOING ON AND THEY HAVE BEEN IN QUIET MODE, IMO!

Latest Filing – What does this show – Many things – Thank You Very Much CSNY/BOPFAN


• Shows how much the Big Money Players and to the extent, they would go to zero, step on Equity


• All law firms involved had failed their fiduciary responsibility purposely, colluded with each other to step on Equity to the point breaking the law thinking NOBODY would notice


• I believe CSNY is exactly correct and the Underwriters claim should be denied in total - ThEY WERE CAUGHT AGAIN trying to damage Equity


• Now what will the Judge think -Rosen entered 35 Stipulations for her approval BUT NOT the Underwriter’s Stipulation – Obvious obfuscation


• Rosen failure to purposely not file a timely 8K when this was known, held Stipulation out for over a year to file in the annual 10K for avoidance purposes


• How many times has a Fiduciary like Rosen who supposedly represented Equity (his words) tried to zero us out, with his rants of “no money for Equity” and now this


• Rosen should be disbarred and the Underwriter’s claim denied in total - maybe Rosen and both law firms he represented along with the Underwriters owe Equity potential damages


• I understand why some here are upset with CSNY and that is because this dilution did not damage commons but only damaged preferred – All depended on how one was invested


• BUT MOST of all, of the investors upset, who are they and why


• I believe the ones MOST upset are ones who pushed for years the 75/25 to the end was BOGUS and they pushed that commons will get the bulk of Safe Harbor/Bankruptcy Remote assets


• Once again, thank you very much CSNY, Dmdmd2020 and ALL who had anything to do with standing by and representing Equity to the extent that should have been afforded from the inception of this case BUT was never accomplished

[jhdf51]

Walraith like pie in her face? This is keystone cops stuff.

JHD