Doog, as a writer and author words, and their meanings, are my tool and study. Thus, I have a problem with your current acclaimed declaration, and here is why.
You wrote: "I challenge anyone who claims there's supposed uncertainty here to counter the FACTUAL catalysts coming as outlined below." Please note your want to emphasize the operative word, factual, with all caps. The sentence, itself, along with the highlighted word was written to assure the reader that the outlined events listed below your current paragraph would, in real life, actually occur-with "no uncertainty here whatsoever."
But within your outline you more than once used the word, probable.
"Probable VYST/Vystar name/symbol change . . ."
"Probable up lising to the QB exchange . . ."
"Potential VYST share repurchase . . ."
Can something that is declared probable be, at the same time, factual? Do words matter to this board? Your declaration sounded nice, Doog, and I love what you add to our VYST knowledge, but something that is a factual occurrence cannot at the same time be quite possible. It is either VYST?Vystar will get a name/symbol change (factual) or, it may or may not get a name/symbol change (probable).
Even more, your list nearly concludes with a catch all supposition: "And any number of additional valuation driving catalysts that VYST mgmt. is busy working on . . ." Well, do you know what the additional driving catalysts are? If not, how do you know with certainty that they will factually happen?
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
