Replies to post #2486 on Fiore Cannabais Ltd. (FIORF)

[LongNDeep2]

I disagree...why bypass 30% MORE of perpetual revenue stream...just to avoid paying an $80 million loan?

Once the loan is paid off...a one time expenditure....50%.....is much better than 20%.

485,000 sf should produce $150 million in revenue at full production. The loan could be paid off in a few years.

That means $75 million revenue instead of $30 million revenue. That's a difference of $45 million a year.

They get a loan at a decent rate...and a decent payback plan.

As I said before...getting half of a project you didn't have before...and getting favorable terms...and no shareholder dilution...what is not to like?

Loans can be paid back....DILUTION LASTS FOREVER.

Imagine if someone offered you that deal?

GLTA

GET LIHT

[LongNDeep2]

Much more revenue is produced by paying off the loan over the long term.

If we look at a ten year projection....it is clear much more revenue will be retained by paying off the loan and getting 50% of the revenue.

If we use $150 million revenue...20% would yield $30 million per year.

If we don't pay the loan...and instead received $30 million per year for 10 years...we get $300 million.

If we do pay back the loan....3 years at $30 million would be enough to pay back $80 million plus interest.

If we received 7 years of revenue at 50%...$75 million.....we would get $525 million.

$525 million vs $300 million...over the first ten year period....$225 million difference.

As time goes on the advantages of getting 50% vs 30% get even greater. The second ten year period of the investment shows....

$750 million vs $300 million...over the second ten year period....$450 million difference.

Over a twenty year investment...that leaves a $675 million dollar difference....that is why LIHT made this deal.

Dilution lasts forever...loans get paid back.

GLTA

GET LIHT...BEFORE THE PARTY