I disagree...why bypass 30% MORE of perpetual revenue stream...just to avoid paying an $80 million loan? Once the loan is paid off...a one time expenditure....50%.....is much better than 20%. 485,000 sf should produce $150 million in revenue at full production. The loan could be paid off in a few years. That means $75 million revenue instead of $30 million revenue. That's a difference of $45 million a year. They get a loan at a decent rate...and a decent payback plan. As I said before...getting half of a project you didn't have before...and getting favorable terms...and no shareholder dilution...what is not to like? Loans can be paid back....DILUTION LASTS FOREVER. Imagine if someone offered you that deal? GLTA GET LIHT