UOIP common shareholders INCLUDES the inventors and patent filers. First filed in 2000. Look it up.
UOIP holds patents that have been upheld at PTAB. The inventors that had their intellectual property stolen would disagree with you. They have been seeking justice since 2012 when Comcast told them "take us to court" (VP of IP & Exec VP)
- In 2015, they joined UOIP and sued the infringing cable companies. Since 2015, Cisco, Arris, & RPX have not been able to invalidate the 3 patents at the PTAB.
- In 2016, Judge Andrews "Markham cleared" UOIP's patent definitions as clear in meaning and ready for trial dismissing cable companies attempts change meaning. Judgement day in the Federal Court of Judge Richard G. Andrews is fast approaching.
Let’s start with a definition of a patent troll.
A troll is a firm that does two distinct things.
-First, it purchases lots of patents that it has no intention of using. That is a prerequisite for being a patent troll, but it doesn’t make a company one. Not UOIP - It HAS ONLY 3 PATENTS
- The second element is essential: They must take this patent (and the vaguer the patent, the better) and threaten lots of companies that in reality have done nothing wrong. Those companies must either pay license fees or defend themselves through the court system. The troll then offers to sell a license at a deeply discounted price, counting on companies deciding that it would be much easier and cheaper to pay than fight. NOT UOIP WHICH HAS VERY DETAILED PATENTS THAT HELD UP IN PTAB COURT AND UOIP WANTS JUST COMPENSATION FOR INVENTING A WAY TO STREAM INTERNET OVER FIBER/COPPER SYSTEMS USED BY CABLE COMPANIES
Easy to find by doing due diligence
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
