Replies to post #38341 on Vystar Corp (VYST)

[bking1965]

I will guess the Ema Financial lawsuit is related to the Buyback PR.

Vystar is not eligible to buyback shares until all convertible notes are paid off. Ema must be protecting their position.

[BootAl]

EMA financial has LEGAL PROBLEMS. Disaster for them IMHO. Criminal Activity? Tic Toc

[doogdilinger]

Toxic funders like EMA are always trying to squeeze OTC PubCo's for additional interest payment monies and when they get told to screw off they file these types of frivolous suits thinking the over-whelming majority of OTC CEO's are broke asses they will beat in court due to the majority of OTC CEO's not even being able to afford an attorney.

So without seeing any additional details on what EMA is alleging in their suit...and the fact that EMA had already been 1 of the dilutive funders selling convertible notes all last year(as the conversions in your copied/pasted conversion table clearly reflect)...my immediate guess is that Felcia decided to try to intimidate VYST with an unreasonable phony baloney interest payment demand on top of their already converted note...and CEO Steve Rotman told her to screw off...so now she's running to court to file another frivolous "interest payment" suit which VYST's CEO is clearly more than ready, willing and able to fight...otherwise the suit wouldn't even have been filed right!

[tutankhamuns]

Interesting. Great DD, sir. $VYST

[General Grievous]

I tried to warn yall you waere buying the topp toppp

[Checkfan]

Thanks for the info. Pacer Monitor link: https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/27142119/Ema_Financial,_LLC_v_Vystar_Corp

[BeasTrader]

Friday, February 22, 2019
misc Notice to Attorney Regarding Rejection of Proposed OrderFri 8:26 AM 
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING REJECTION OF PROPOSED ORDER. Notice to Attorney Jeffrey Fleischmann re: Document 14 Proposed Order to Show Cause Without Emergency Relief was rejected by the Clerk's Office for the following reason: the document was filed in the wrong case. (km)

[StocksGoneWild]

From yesterday: DECLARATION of Barry Bordetsky in Opposition re:12 Order to Show Cause,,,,,,,,, Set Deadlines,,,,,,,,. Document filed by Vystar Corp..(Bordetsky, Barry)


https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/27142119/Ema_Financial,_LLC_v_Vystar_Corp

By presenting an order to show cause with supporting papers, the moving party has the opportunity to obtain the judge's input at the outset of the motion, rather than waiting until all the moving, answering, and reply papers are fully submitted. The use of an order to show cause instead of a notice of motion does not affect the parties' burden of proof on the underlying motion.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Order_to_show_cause