Replies to post #176160 on Anavex Life Sciences Corp (AVXL)

[XenaLives]

One must discern the difference between a logical flaw and a difference of opinion. It is my opinion that the results of the 2a show a high probability that 2-73 could be approved on the basis of sleep quality alone.

Your opinion is apparently different.

The confirmatory trials will give us a final answer soon.

There is no logical flaw in my post.

You feel that P2a results are sufficient to indicate a unique/advantageous MOA that would therefore underpin P2a results and therefore provide reasons to counter the many doubts raised concerning the P2a results. Is it even necessary to point out the logical flaws of this line of argument?

[blu_1]

What do you like about AVXL so much that you devote hundreds of hours to following and commenting on it?