Replies to post #215926 on Mike Lindell Media Corp (MLMC)

[william2112]

sentinel,

just to keep it real:

In March 2004, we launched our website, http://www.gameznflix.com, and became fully operational in September 2004. In conjunction with the website the Company runs ad campaigns designed to create awareness among our target consumers and to generate traffic to the website

http://yahoo.brand.edgar-online.com/fetchFilingFrameset.aspx?FilingID=4735961&Type=HTML

just having fun..best of luck1

sinc,

bill

[pimpinainteasy]

sentinel tell all the facts. I thought they didnt launch until september 04, so thats 2 years 2 months. I love how you round 11,800 down to 11k. so you round down and extend how long they have been open, negtive lately?

Fact is they werent ready for business when they opened. they promoted before they could handle it. churn rate was outragious. they screwed themselves and basically had to start over. did so about a year ago. they added new distribution centers and are now doing more marketing. in the correct order this time. so yes they have been open longer than the last year, but they had to take a second try at it.

can you asnwer why you are still here if its such a failure? why did you hold so long watching all your money go down the drain? why didnt you cast your vote on the companies actions by selling? I mean you still dont find the current business operation to your liking. yet you hang on and complain. Just what does it take to fold a losing hand? are you here to warn us? or what exactly? I just dont get it, either you believe or you dont and if you dont play one of the many other 1000's of otc stocks. Time to get over it

[bag8ger]

Sentinel,

To keep using the "three year" description does a disservice to all.

Unless you qualify it with a narrative which includes the fact that a bunch of wild-eyed investors hacked a website before it was ready and the company was forced to come on-line before it was ready.

As a result, service was lousy, the advertising that was done, although not the best in the industry, nevertheless brought customers only to have them become "churn" because of the miserable service.

To say positive things have not happened in the past year neglects to inform the potential investor how far GZFX has come from their dismal past.

By all reports, service is good. Debt is minimal because dilution is a matter of fact.

JF is building a foundation which, in almost every case with an OTC company, is ignored by the pps which will remain niggardly until the foundation is seen as supporting the subscription rate it has been designed for.