News Focus
News Focus
icon url

ShysterChaser

11/04/06 7:07 PM

#51748 RE: spokeshave #51745

Let's see.

ANI licensed an unfinished PowerStream technology to RaySpoiltMyInvestment. PowerStream was engineered to constitute 80% of the Embarq disruptive technology. The wizards in Taxachusetts were going to make that combination work. Whatever happened to that game plan?

Didn't the Hare Krishnas have some magical transformation going in Hyderabad for broadband over existing copper loops that would loose a Cascade of Miracles for the family of communications transport?

Now with at least one sycophant of sophistry forecasting revenue for RaySpoiltMyInvestment for the First Quarter of Eternity, after seemingly abandoning all hope for calendar year 2006, I should feel exalted, right? TIA.
icon url

427Cobra

11/04/06 7:24 PM

#51751 RE: spokeshave #51745

spoke: Again, I am confused. You said, Seriously. If Brad told you this, then he is an idiot.

ASICs are patented, copyrighted devices. You can't just take someone else's product, modify it, and call it your own (although Rim has done that with pictures...). The only way this could possibly happen would be if the other company licensed their product to Rim. What company would license their product to a competitor?


I thought that a structured asic was one that was made by another company, kind of a prefab asic that you buy from them to put your code on. It sure sounded that way from the article I read earlier in the year about LSI's chip, and from the IEE times article. Are you saying then, that the company makes their own structured asic and doesn't buy someone elses?

icon url

427Cobra

11/04/06 9:58 PM

#51764 RE: spokeshave #51745

spoke: They company has clearly said that their product will be an ASSP. Not and FPGA and not a structured ASIC. My analysis is based on those facts, not your made up fantasies.

Moxon: If pressed, the conversion from FPGA to a slightly less complex version of the integrated circuit (IC), called an ASSC (Application Specific Structured Cell), could take place in 30 days!

Since you were responding to my comment from Moxon, I think that his statement clearly communicates that this solution could happen if they needed it to. I also said that Brad brought up the structured asic as an example of what could be used even though there was no decision to do that at the time. Companies have plans, sometimes they change them. I was showing options that could lead to results that coincide with their statement that there would be orders this year.

So, I tell you about an option I heard from Brad, then the quote where Moxon gave an alternative scenario and you then accuse me of a made up fantasy.