If AF is wrong, he is setting up journalism for legislative intervention in the future. Unfortunately, journalism might well be reigned in because a few bad apples state allegations as fact instead of opinion, and cripple little biotechs. He is the perfect vehicle for the courts to take a bite out of first amendment privelages for the press. Too bad anyway one looks at it. Too bad that is except for any true future corporate bad actors.
It’s hard to think he would not know the likely consequences of his actions if he turns out to be wrong. Almost as if he wants freedom of press restricted to protect corporations in the future.
Regarding the point you raise, the concern is not that people lose their money from following AF, the concern is AF needlessly attacks vulnerable companies with rumor stated as fact despite the point that they may be dead wrong — giving the opportunity for shorts and bears to pile on.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
