That's what I got out of it. They are arguing the USPTO's point of jurisdiction, basically insisting that the court should take into consideration the economic impact to the petitioner before refusing to hear the case. And... they seem to be signaling that they will file a case with the Supreme Court if the court of appeals dismisses the case.
When you willfully infringe on patents, you cant go to court and argue that having to pay back ill gotten gains would have a negative economic impact on your business.