That dog won’t hunt. Doesn’t matter who transcribed it, your argument that they were consistently telling us this was not an event driven trial to get us to data lock, topline and finish/end/complete is not believable to me. You might try discussing this with someone else.
If EOY 2015-early 2016 was the primary endpoint predicted during 2014, why were these results only unveiled at 2/16? Is it possible that the 248 PFS events occurred a long time before the results were presented or was the estimation for the time of occurrence of 248 PFS events way off target?
The fact that you had to transcribe it in the first place and and Ms. Powers apparently did not want an official record made for us to see, should tell you something about how clearly they were trying to communicate to all shareholders.