"Nice to see that some real DD was done and proved this post falls under the category of FAKE NEWS"
I'm going to post the only source that I know of that suggests that the original report, which was factual as far as it went, was "FAKE NEWS"(a misrepresentation of its own). If you have another source for the same information please provide it.
"And, the deal made through the MFO had nothing to do with his son. He found the "fund" (he didn't confirm it was with LLEX) through his own personal contacts and no fees were paid to anyone."
This "Got an answer back from my e-mail I sent to Leo yesterday" stuff can be valuable DD, but I'll never understand why the people who provide it persist in characterizing the response instead of quoting it. Instead of the CEO's words we're stuck with the reporters interpretation of them.