Replies to post #169958 on Anavex Life Sciences Corp (AVXL)

[nidan7500]

Biostockclub, simply brilliant and a lot of work. Thanks.

[McMagyar]

beautifully brutal post..well said..

[plexrec]

Biostock---"A lot happened at the CTAD."---again--one outstanding post----Thanks

[Amatuer17]

Bio - nice work and a lot of efforts
Liked reading all those twitter posts.

Few observations

- like your conclusion - it was a conference of failures

- amyloid and BACE theory is not working - does not mean A2-73 is working - it still needs proof.

- Meg T is quite influential - on her tweet, someone should ask about if she has looked at AVXL and NTRP - why she focuses on BP only (most likely she is biotech investor analyst and not scientific reporter)

- Andy biotech is a straight shooter - need to see if he can look at AVXL

- with lot of theories failing, AVXL can use some good marketing to push their theory and some BP may become interested in collaboration

- hope Lane S writes an article on AVXL as he highlights some of the points on SA which has better readership and wide cross section

[tredenwater2]

Thank you Bio, very informative and consolidated view of this weeks CTAD and more.

Tred

[drv17]

"We think differently and have NO FEAR." Maybe Dr. Liar didn't lie after all.

Thank you Bio for all of the work you do in the analysis of AVXL. Also thanks to all of the excellent scientifically knowledgeable posters on this board (I'm afraid to list for fear of overlooking someone) to help those of us that do not have that background.

This was a very successful conference for Anavex (IMO) and will look forward to Lane Simonian's article and/or an article by Michelle Sullivan (Alz_Gal) in Seeking Alpha to shout to a large audience.