Because that makes sense? Such claims are pretty short sighted thinking, do not reflect AMFEs current position or story, or even have depth of full thought associate with the impact.
Roger had to do 1000 things right for every 1 wrong to get us to the strength and position AMFE is in today. As the company grows positions may change, but for high class reasons, not core business reasons like the claim infers as to why a change in guard would be merited.
AMFE is stronger than 99+% of all other pinks, which is why they won't be pinks for long. Most companies would be lucky to have AMFEs challenges as a growing and developing company / brand.
Savvy investors know AMFE is a highly performing and highly undervalued company, and a great opportunity to get a stock incredibly well priced for a strong long ROI
All evidence points to that, there is no refuting it, simple as that.
There have been zero claims to a negative long term outlook for AMFE.
Zero, i have asked 301 times now over the past year, and not a single time has anyone made a negative long term case backed by evidence.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
