News Focus
News Focus
icon url

jobynimble

09/29/18 12:42 PM

#47436 RE: Harry Winston #47435

I’m not stopping you from asking questions, I would never do that to anyone. But if you think logically about what you’re asking most of your questions require filings to be updated before they can be answered, imo...

The manner in which you criticized Kevin with threats of jail time are completely without merit and if you think threats will get you answers faster you better rethink your childish approach...
icon url

nobody12378

09/29/18 1:00 PM

#47437 RE: Harry Winston #47435

Unless you are willing to call DW a liar, Greenshift owns the patents.
icon url

GreenShift

09/29/18 10:57 PM

#47442 RE: Harry Winston #47435

Mr. Winston -

Thank you for asking.

1-3 - It is reasonable to expect that our results of operations between October 1, 2016 and March 31, 2018, were materially consistent with prior periods. Our operating income is positive. You’re free to assume that our net worth is negative until and unless we report otherwise. Aside from that, Mr. Nimble is correct. I am limited by what I can say for now. Further detail will need to wait for the completion of our audits and the filing of our reports.

4-5 - GreenShift’s wholly-owned subsidiary, GS CleanTech Corporation, is the sole owner of all of our extraction patents and all applicable license agreements. No patents or licenses have been transferred.

6 - Our policy is not to comment on matters subject to pending litigation. However, I will say that we’re still here in spite of everything for a reason. I strongly believe that we are right and I have faith in the system. My partners and I are prepared to spend another decade fighting if need be. Read into that what you will.

7 - Yes.

8 - It wasn’t. It’s a different court. The access protocols are simply different (see below). We don’t have an explanation, but it’s not because anyone is trying to hide anything. The brief is on our website.

Do you want to ask any questions to confirm the veracity of your accusations? If so, now is the time. We need the issue to be resolved.

Your core point about transparency was correct. However, there is no SEC contract, no laws were broken, and there will be no prosecution. I didn’t neglect my duties by not filing. I honored them. I chose the lesser evil, and I couldn’t broadcast it without defeating the purpose. Again, I regret any confusion that may have caused.

I’m choosing to look past the negativity and interpret your comments to mean that I need to be more responsive, especially until our filings are out, and even if it means temporarily using unorthodox methods like posting on this board. In exchange, I hope that you can agree to find more constructive ways of expressing your criticisms and frustrations. You’re free to email me directly at any time.

The stakes are far too high. People tend to think about fire if they see something that resembles smoke, even if it’s nothing more than a hundred posts of hot air. Shouting fake or misinformed news loud enough for long enough can alter perception and influence action. Russia just took all of us to that school. Google me. Look at the words that feed the autofill. It’s obviously not true, and yet that’s what people see. I get asked about it all the time. Because people make uninformed comments on these boards.

Everyone that posts here should assume that everyone that matters to our future is going to read whatever you write - including current and future licensees, investors, adversaries, attorneys, clerks, and judges. Please remember that anything you post will be there forever, and that your words can have unintended harmful consequences. We’re all in this together.

Thank you for your interest and support.

Sincerely,
Kevin Kreisler
GreenShift Corporation

PACER Access Instructions:

https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__pacer.login.uscourts.gov&d=DwIGaQ&c=gAzS7Z2sPulVLgfP0R9Uzw&r=zQtoayD7hsASLMwR4qL9rV3LsVVohMG2v8wFNrQTXo8&m=nSfkKXjQ2bg-FrGmQRkfKgtxuZeIEb7D0obJd1k6gmw&s=VJ6YM0iwZqcFZCeIJ3H2qW_xX3z3uojReSiXvnI4CrM&e=

Search for case number 16-2231.

Click on the case number (not the case name).

Select docket item 62 for the public version of the CleanTech opening appeal brief.