News Focus
News Focus
icon url

gdb81

10/28/06 7:01 PM

#117517 RE: cindyyoohoo #117513

Well, amongst the many accounting irregularities in the 10k, one of the more subtle ones was that they appear to have already (in their minds) completed the merger and made the accounting entries necessary to show a combined new business entity. That 10k was for a new corporate entity i.e., resetting the retained earnings, changing the capital structure.

The merger appears to be legally completed, so they are entitled to the bonds, but Rufus' failure to file that with the SEC will tie that up in court for approximately the rest of eternity in terms of the share exchange, who gets what, etc.
icon url

janniebgood

10/28/06 8:33 PM

#117581 RE: cindyyoohoo #117513

Cindy - wasn't there a form S-4 which needed to be filed in order for the merger to be complete?