Rufus has changed his story on the bonds a few times. According to the 10k balance sheet they are owned no strings attached, save for a 40 million note against the UCC note. According to the 10k wording the 500 million bond has a liability: 40% of the profits (ie the interest), on the radio he quoted 50% two days ago.
There's no way he gets out of the bond issue free and clear, ha. Forget the deutche bank contract which is pretty much an open and shut charge.
As Rufus mentioned last night, if you have a billion dollar bond, that's AAA rated you can borrow a billion dollars against it (to pay for it). But nobody but him in the world, thinks that's an asset without a liability that can be used to pump up a stock.
Listen to all his talk about letters of credit, that's proof positive that the rest of his story is false. If you have free and clear ownership of billions of dollars of bonds, you should be a money loaner, not a money borrower. dead on 100% correct