News Focus
News Focus
icon url

nidan7500

08/24/18 1:44 PM

#163616 RE: XenaLives #163613

Xena links:

Ms. Sheehan was on a randomized trial where both groups of patients received treatment with Olaparib. One group got the drug only, the other received Olaparib in combination with another drug, her doctor said, adding, “there was no placebo.”

In remission, Ms. Sheehan has become a fan of small trials that offer women such as herself options. She also is a realist. If Olaparib fails, she hopes other trials now going on may yield treatments for her.

The big randomized clinical trial is an “endangered species,” says the senior author of a recent study that charted a decline in clinical trials funded by the National Institutes of Health. “Everyone wants an answer in a hurry. Everyone wants to study a few patients,” says Curtis Meinert, a professor at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.



Isn't the whole point on Precision Medicine..."Precision"? Big, expensive, time consuming trials provide no certainty of outcome over precisely detailed pre work. Some generals still fighting the last war.
icon url

Bourbon_on_my_cornflakes

08/24/18 2:06 PM

#163621 RE: XenaLives #163613

"Missling is just ahead of the pack.... "

Absolutely.

1.Adaptive trials
2.Genomic analysis of p2,
3. Genomic screening for P3
4. Australian govt funding.
5. Multiple shots on goal.
6. FDA bypass when needed.

Best of breed.
icon url

Biostockclub

08/24/18 2:33 PM

#163624 RE: XenaLives #163613

He is ahead of the pack for CNS. Cancer is doing away with placebos altogether. (Almost)

New FDA guidances put out yesterday:
Note the last paragraph.

If cancer is doing this, CNS won’t be far behind.
(Also from Endpoints. Could not link.)
——————————————————
Need a placebo control group for your next cancer drug study? Only in certain circumstances, says FDA

by zachary brennan - raps — on August 23, 2018 04:56 PM EDT
Updated: 04:58 PM


Given the ethical challenges of using a placebo in randomized controlled clinical trials for therapies to treat hematologic malignancy and oncologic disease, the FDA recommends that a sponsor use a placebo-controlled design only in select circumstances, according to new draft guidance released Thursday.

Such circumstances include “where surveillance is standard of care,” or with specific trial “design features (e.g. if the trial uses an add-on design, when the endpoint intended to support a labeling claim has a high degree of subjectivity, such as patient reported outcomes).”

And when considering the use of a placebo control, the FDA says sponsors should provide a rationale for the trial design and a detailed description in the protocol and statistical analysis plan of the proposal for blinding and unblinding.

“If a sponsor intends to maintain the treatment blind when disease recurs or progresses or a suspected adverse event occurs, the informed consent document should specify the risks and potential disadvantages of this approach, and the protocol should include justification for the potential added risk,” the three-page draft says.

The FDA also recommends that sponsors unblind a patient “at the time of documented disease recurrence or progression to ensure optimal patient management.”

Continued blinding at the time of disease progression or occurrence of serious adverse events presents additional challenges, the FDA says.

For example, in a blinded immunotherapy trial, a patient who develops adverse events on the control arm may receive unnecessary treatments (e.g., immunosuppressive drug products including a high dose of glucocorticoids, cyclophosphamide, interleukin-6 antagonist, or infliximab) for management of adverse events incorrectly attributed to the investigational drug product.

Maintaining the blind after disease progression could also affect a patient’s subsequent therapy.

The FDA also recommends unblinding the patient and investigator “when the patient has an adverse event suspected to be related to the investigational drug product and for which management of the adverse event with one or more drug products with substantial toxicity or invasive procedures is being considered. In such cases of unblinding, the patient should not be removed from the trial.”

In terms of the practical and ethical concerns related to using placebos in some oncology trials, the FDA notes that in many cases, because of the toxicity of the active treatment, patients and investigators may know if they are receiving a placebo treatment.