Ehh, I really wouldn't put much trust in Rufus's words. Do you really think CSHD, or any company for that matter, WANTS to be sued by the SEC? If it weren't so "difficult" (wonder why) to prove ownership of these bonds this whole thing wouldn't heve even progressed to this stage.
Most reasonable people will agree that causing your stock to be suspended by the SEC is not a smart business move.
LOL, lesn. You criticize scam exposes, but come out with the completely undocumented (and bizarre) claim that "it's clear that the company wanted it this way". What facts make that clear, or can you read Rufus' mind?