Replies to post #15220 on SunHydrogen Inc (HYSR)

[Interestking]

Great post Sir and I would add that having read through RSH’s “facts” that the date of his “facts” pertain to 2004.
GL all serious investors.

[JoseSD]

So what?

Where is HYSR in all of this? HYSR doesn't even disclose anything because their system simply doesn't work.

DOE is legit...HYSR is not.

This is what HYSR is:

[rsh]

That is a National Laboratorys and a few associated "well funded" universities wish list document. The question is what do you think that has to do with HYSR or its 2 universities that are nowhere mentioned in that presentation? HYSR is NOT is this arena of research.

That reference has nothing to do with HYSR. It has to do with what the National Labs are trying to do and with a lot of dollars. BTW, they are not yet successful.

You are twisting information - more fake news!

[geymfish]

Which part claimed that HYSR has achieved the metrics. Last time i check it it says compare. Who is making the fake news now.

[geymfish]

Oh no. HYSR doesnt care about the DOE metrics. You really have a big problem.

[geymfish]

For now...Since when did you see a chart that doesnt change?

[geymfish]

Desperate. the input is minimal as oppose to the amount of time you spent disproving the current innovation... talk about efficiency. yer right... not my words. dispute DOE

[geymfish]

ok. thank you for your insight

[geymfish]

Breaking news!













“... the DOE Labs (one of which is mine!) are working on the technology and NOT selling any BS! “

Bingo! Right from your own mouth! How dare for being double standard all this time claiming that you are not biased.

So now we know that Hypersolar is your competitor and you have just divulged your personal agenda. You have a conflict of interest and that is what the animosity is all about. You dreaded the fact that they this close to meeting the DOE metrics. And you are going nowhere.

How could you? We love to hear your spin.

People in this forum this is your chance. lol

—————————


Re: geymfish Post# 15234
NO, again you are out in a different ballpark! I need not dispute DOE - they are not selling anything. I dispute HYSR! What part of that don't you understand? HYSR is not anywhere near the Major Leagues, I don't think they are even in T-Ball yet. HYSR is selling Notes, the DOE Labs (one of which is mine!) are working on the technology and NOT selling any BS!

You are consistent in that you change the target so you don't have to do anything. You want others to prove something that does not need to be proved so you don't have to see the fallacy of your own argument. Magicians and fake news folks use that tactic. Scientists do NOT!




cc. file

[geymfish]

Re: rsh Post# 15238
Really go figure! And that makes you objective? Should you be told to recuse yourself from giving comments about HYSR operation. You are a decent scientist and thst should be a no-brainer.

You have more disclosure to give. whats the post number were curious about that? Slippage ha? but its ok soetimes it happens

[geymfish]

Too late too obvious. And you really believe i will find the post.
youre kidding right?

i said its ok you can sleep tonight since i wont insist on asking for the post # saying that you have a lab engage in sustainable hydrogen production. good night.

[Frizzo]

Your posts are great!!! Relevant facts!

MONEY STORM COMINGGG!!!

[geymfish]

Moving forward in 2018

“In the coming months, the Company will send its prototype to a reputable third-party such as National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), for testing and validation.“

“HyperSolar believes this product roadmap will allow the Company to enter the hydrogen market quickly, and also the potential to completely revolutionize the global hydrogen market with a very low cost solar hydrogen technology.”

http://www.hypersolar.com/news_detail.php?id=91

[geymfish]

Re: Interestking Post# 15287
Every factual progress that HYSR has achieved (per DOE metrics) is worth sharing . The “recyclers” who thrive on boring predictable littanies hate it because it exposes their baseless personal claims and opinions. Did you notice that 99% of their postings have no source links but garbage?

We base our investment decisions on current scientific facts and innovations not on temporary stock prices or dilutions. Investment 101 tells us that the Stock prices and dilutions are temporary measures. The real stock price value is a byproduct when the ultimate goals are achieved.

This information is not meant for the recylers apocalypse or horsemen and those who have conflict of interest. They have their own agenda and values and we wish them well. This is for those who have positive intentions and for those who believe that we are responsible for our own future by supporting the inititive of clean and sustainable energy. We are not doing this for ourselves but for our children and for the future generation.

We refuse to be bullied by negativity. Dont give them a platform by responding or entertaining their silly baseless posts. Ignore them. Our information is coming from a neutral establishment the DOE.



Report TOS

[geymfish]

We found the missing link... page 4

UCSB (UC Santa Barbara) is part of PEC working group commissioned by DOE in 2010.

“The US DOE Photoelectrochemical (PEC) Working Group brings together Academic, Industry and National Laboratory leaders in the research and development of practical PEC semiconductor systems to produce hydrogen via solar water-splitting”

“The DOE PEC Working Group’s primary objective is to develop practical solar hydrogen-production technology, using innovative semiconductor materials & devices R&D to foster the needed scientific breakthroughs for meeting DOE Hydrogen Program goals.”

“Completed writing & reviewing of 16 standard PEC protocols
– A successful telecom/webcasting collaboration among a diverse group of universities and National Labs, including NREL, DOE, Stanford University, University of Hawaii, University of Santa Barbara, University of Louisville, University of Tokyo and Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organization.” page 15

So guys lets wait for the news and ignore the noise.

https://www.hydrogen.energy.gov/pdfs/review10/pd032_miller_2010_o_web.pdf


p.s. - i know unrelated link right?
- now we know where the animosity is coming from