Re: Everything, whether Safe Harbor or not relating to ownership reverts back to those who signed timely releases by 3/2012, which was an ownership change that was effective on 3/19/2012.
If that's the case, is the S4V theory not possible and dead? If all assets "evert back to those who signed timely releases by 3/2012" then it means that it cannot go to WMIH, right? Because WMIH shareholders include 80% and more of those who didn't sign release, right?
And the merger has nothing to do with the distribution of escrow, right?
Please confirm all of the above. EOM.