News Focus
News Focus
Followers 9
Posts 4746
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/14/2016

Re: Large Green post# 533941

Sunday, 08/19/2018 1:21:40 PM

Sunday, August 19, 2018 1:21:40 PM

Post# of 749756
Re: Everything, whether Safe Harbor or not relating to ownership reverts back to those who signed timely releases by 3/2012, which was an ownership change that was effective on 3/19/2012.

If that's the case, is the S4V theory not possible and dead? If all assets "evert back to those who signed timely releases by 3/2012" then it means that it cannot go to WMIH, right? Because WMIH shareholders include 80% and more of those who didn't sign release, right?

And the merger has nothing to do with the distribution of escrow, right?

Please confirm all of the above. EOM.

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today