News Focus
News Focus
icon url

cm3i long termer

10/22/06 5:52 PM

#127963 RE: 4Justice #127955

I would be happy with either one.

In the long run, IMO the Nasdaq would be a better play.

I have seen stocks jump $20 in a day on the NAS with a good revenue report.

Either way we can call Mad Money and ask his opinion.

It would be fun to see him rant about it.
icon url

scorpio70

10/22/06 5:57 PM

#127970 RE: 4Justice #127955

Always with the negative there Justice..

Exposure of the Nasdaq is where you want to be. Shorts need to cover ASAP and Petar V. has the smarts and the goods to make those shorting SLJB pay for it heavily.
icon url

oreodiamonds

10/22/06 6:12 PM

#127988 RE: 4Justice #127955

After what the AMEX did to GTE requiring an RS of 15 to 1 No Thanks Mr. AMEX!
icon url

equityofficer

10/22/06 7:17 PM

#128048 RE: 4Justice #127955

Uggghhh. Do some homework, will ya'?em.
icon url

Joe Burmeister

10/22/06 7:50 PM

#128099 RE: 4Justice #127955

How is SLJB going to get out of Pinkie land with only one year of (supposedly) audited financials (June 1st 2005 to May 31st 2006). I thought last 3 years was required to get on a higher exchange.

And why is Petar stepping down as CEO early next year after less then a year in service as head honcho? Doesn't the quick turnover of CEOs raise a red flag to anyone?

And what's with the firing of the Investor Relations company and setting up a blog on their website to communicate material nonpublic information (violation of SEC rules?). I have never heard of a public company setting up a blog/forum on the official company website. What CEO has the time to chit chat with fellow investors and, at the same time, churn out multi million dollar deals while heavily medicated? Could it be that Petar will be long gone when the dust clears, and the next CEO has to take the heat for all these unverified scrupulous transactions designed to artificially inflate PPS. Remember nothing after May 31st 2006 will be audited!
icon url

syracuseo

10/22/06 9:12 PM

#128230 RE: 4Justice #127955

4 Justice....

Perhaps the BEST answer was one provided by either Steve Sulja or Petar back in Sept. when they stated that the NET revenue of SLJB will easily justify NSDQ listing .

Hence, worrying about making the $4 minimum is not a concern, therefore, they would try to get a mark down exchange with Amex with a $2 minimum.

More than likely, though, the NSDQ also carries more prestige Internationaly than does the Amex.....important for their ME clintel and other FUTURE international customers.

Also, on the topic of cement deals, Steve Sulja mentioned that they were negotiating SEVERAL cement deals in Dubai, because of the HUGE demand there. So, wether the $350 mil is on or off, there seems to be many other fish in the sea .

Looking forward to an interesting week !