I'm saying the slide (if read at face value (it's interpretation was never confirmed or denied)) information LL was given by the CRO, Cognate, regulators or NWBO was was likely not a prediction, but more likely derived from shipping records. The publication has since confirmed the investigators learned how many placebo crossed-over from shipping records made available. Whoever monitored the shipping records should/miust have also then known when placebo doses stopped being sent with no DCVax-L following. It's pretty simple. It's still technically blinded, and it is still randomized under that scenario, but outsiders don't have a clear understanding whether the
above is correct.