News Focus
News Focus
icon url

flipper44

06/25/18 2:03 PM

#179585 RE: Extremist223 #179583

I'm saying the slide (if read at face value (it's interpretation was never confirmed or denied)) information LL was given by the CRO, Cognate, regulators or NWBO was was likely not a prediction, but more likely derived from shipping records. The publication has since confirmed the investigators learned how many placebo crossed-over from shipping records made available. Whoever monitored the shipping records should/miust have also then known when placebo doses stopped being sent with no DCVax-L following. It's pretty simple. It's still technically blinded, and it is still randomized under that scenario, but outsiders don't have a clear understanding whether the
above is correct.
icon url

flipper44

06/25/18 2:52 PM

#179589 RE: Extremist223 #179583

"I can see it being possible they didn't move forward for AA so that they can load up and regain % stake." -- Extremist



Correct, but they'll have their reasons, such as the PFS count needed to be more perfect. Or, the one we've heard since January 2018, they want a bigger fatter curve/tail -- which to me, particularly after the current data collection is finished -- is ridiculous, because we've had eleven years of curve, with no one year of enrollees meaningfully impacting the curve more than any other -- save, perhaps any that were enrolled but not randomized (aka: possibly the last 31).

Meanwhile LP will be getting up to 200 million(?) or so total shares by the time her loan (for shares) comes due in August 2018.