News Focus
News Focus
icon url

jerrylev

05/25/18 2:59 PM

#520173 RE: boarddork #520169

OK I read it and it is a little bit vague. It only said that the settlement does not IMPLY that JPM became the successor in interest.

And so I think that JPM didn't get the whole thing but FDIC-R retained partially to pay the claims.

JPM didn't even have to settle if it owns nothing, but it does pwn something but not everything.

It should simply say that JPM IS NOT THE SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST. PERIOD.

OK BD, I believe you.

Partially :)