InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 9
Posts 4746
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/14/2016

Re: boarddork post# 520169

Friday, 05/25/2018 2:59:37 PM

Friday, May 25, 2018 2:59:37 PM

Post# of 727371
OK I read it and it is a little bit vague. It only said that the settlement does not IMPLY that JPM became the successor in interest.

And so I think that JPM didn't get the whole thing but FDIC-R retained partially to pay the claims.

JPM didn't even have to settle if it owns nothing, but it does pwn something but not everything.

It should simply say that JPM IS NOT THE SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST. PERIOD.

OK BD, I believe you.

Partially :)
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent COOP News