Daniel learned that it was a mistake to post that much information. He did so for Black Swan, and it was immediately disected, criticized, and questioned....for MONTHS.
I think if you look back at his overall history of providing details and providing regular PRs: both changed DRAMATICALLY after the Black Swan announcement (last June, if memory serves). He was dragged through the mud because of an administrative error that Black Swan made (failing to renew it's corporate annual report in a timely manner). Who's BS? Where are they? What? Why NV? Can't be NV, the annual report's not current. Blah Blah Blah. It went on for months (literally).
Not long after that, I asked if he could provide a patent number to squash some minor outburst or other. His response was (sic) "I could, but why would I? They'll just dig through the details and come up with 5 more hoops for us to jump through, and ask 5 more questions based on their misunderstanding of the systems and technology. We'll just be setting the precedent that if they scream then we will jump through their hoops. I don't have the time or manpower to do that. Everyone will learn of the details when it's time for them to be released."
So....we wait.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
