Replies to post #43911 on UnifiedOnline Inc fka UOIP

[gooferball]

Hope there's enough similarity in the case for the judge to also consider "undue prejudice to Plaintiffs"

[ahall]

Figure we would see more action if that were the case.. at this stage hopefully UOIP pushes for trial

[faqt]

I see, Judge has ordered additions the privelege log that protects the CB Capital valuation (by UOIP)

Wednesday, May 09, 2018
258 order Oral Order Wed 9:09 AM
ORAL ORDER: After review of the discovery letters (D.I.253 ,255 ), the Court will need to have a conference to resolve the issues. Plaintiff is ORDERED to supplement its privilege log to show attorney involvement (by name) in every entry if there is any attorney involvement. Plaintiff is to produce the privilege log to Defendants at least three days before the discovery conference. Defendants are to identify at least one day before the conference ten entries that they want the Court to examine more closely, and Plaintiff is to bring the documents described in the ten entries in the event that in camera inspection is necessary. If the Court is not satisfied at that time that the privilege log is sufficient, a full examination will be made by a Special Master, at Plaintiff's expense. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 5/9/2018. (nms)

nationalparalegal.edu/API_AK/courseware_asp_files/E-Discovery/Lecture07/Privilege_Log.Template.doc_-_Google_Drive.pdf
A privilege log is a list of documents the parties in a case believe are privileged and immune from disclosure in the lawsuit.
Federal and some state rules apply to the creation of privilege logs. Always check the rules. Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(1) states:
Parties may obtain discovery regarding any non-privileged matter that is relevant to any party’s claim or defense – including the existence, description, nature, custody, condition, and location of any documents or other tangible things and the identity and location of persons who know of any discoverable matter.
Just because one party designates certain documents as being privileged, does not make them privileged. The party seeking protection from disclosure has the burden of proving that the materials are legally privileged.
Types of Privilege:
1. Attorney/Client Privilege: communications between a client and his attorney.
2. Privacy Laws: Right to privacy under the Constitution or any law enacted by the government.
3. Attorney Work Product: Trial preparation documents, reports, statements, correspondence, and other documents
prepared in anticipation of litigation that reveal the attorney’s thoughts and mental impressions.
4. Trade Secrets: Documents that reveal formulas, practices, processes, designs, patterns, and/or other information
not generally known, with which a business can obtain economic advantage over competitors or customers.
A proper privilege log must contain:
1. The type of document for which the privilege is claimed.
2. The name and designation or capacity of the provider/author of the document.
3. The name and designation or capacity of each recipient.
4. The date of the information or the date on which the document was prepared, sent, or shared.

long UOIP

[BrokeAgent]

I wonder if they have already thrown out a number and defendants now want to see how they determined that value?