Replies to post #42914 on UnifiedOnline Inc fka UOIP

[TonyJoe1957]

http://www.cbcapital.com/services/valuations.htm

[TonyJoe1957]

If CB Capital valuation was made public, it would be helpful and impact PPS.

[Evilbean]

Ice, thanks for putting this out. This is very good news indeed! This just might send the price up today past yesterday’s predictions put forth by many people.

AJ, I am not sure that the valuations from CB would be helpful at this time. I think it might provide opportunity for the defendants to have more time to undermine the valuations provided to UOIP/Chanbond. It also leads me to believe this might end up being a monster (in a very uneducated and guessing way)!

All said today just might be a whopper of a day!

[zombywolf]

I told you guys you were going to like that judge.

[Ultimate Warrior]

In the words of the Immortal Ric Flair, WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!

[VortMax]

This is massive. Defendants are seeking a valuation. UOIP named as beneficary.

[VortMax]

Sticky

[olico ™]

This is awesome!

[trademax42]

Awesome post, thank you.

$UOIP$

imho only.

[rstar]

Wow! what an update!!!!

$UOIP!

[I_Am_Ram]

Well... here we go...

[VortMax]

enormous read....defendants seeking valuation of UOIP via Chanbond

[rstar]

have we seen or do we have access to the CB capital valuation??

2) Defendants’ request for production of documents underlying the CB Capital valuation is DENIED. "Unified Online, the current owner of ChanBond," retained CB Capital as a non-testifying expert consultant and such communications are protected under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

[crudeoil24]

Absolutely huge update > Thank you!

[VortMax]

AVERAGE INTERNET SPEED MORE THAN TRIPLED SINCE 2011, SO UOIP TECH PATENTED IS WORTH AT LEAST 3/4 OF THE $1T THE 13 CABLE COMPANIES CHARGE DURING THE 2012 TO 2020 TIMEFRAM FOR THE SERVICE. IF 1.5%, WHICH IS NORMAL, THAT IS AROUND $10b. http://bgr.com/2016/01/02/us-internet-speeds-average/

[rstar]

loving this most recent pacer update! lots to read between the lines:

"Monday, May 07, 2018 PROPOSED ORDER Denying Defendants' Discovery Requests re255 Letter by ChanBond, LLC. (Brauerman, Stephen)"
Summary:

The court of Honorable Richard G. Andrews considered the issues raised in Defendants’ letter of May 1, 2018 and Plaintiff’s May 4, 2018 letter, and ordered following:

1) Defendants’ requested to re-open the deposition of Patrick Keane. Mr. Keane provided to CBV legal advice regarding patent portfolio. The request is DENIED as the communication involving the legal advice are protected by the attorney client privilege.
2) Defendants’ request for production of documents underlying the CB Capital valuation is DENIED. "Unified Online, the current owner of ChanBond," retained CB Capital as a non-testifying expert consultant and such communications are protected under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
3) Defendants’ request for a supplemental privilege log, or alternatively the production of the documents withheld on the basis of privilege is DENIED.

[VortMax]

This needs to be a sti ky

[DreamGreen]

Love this post! DENIED.. DENIED...DENIED! Another one of those times where I almost feel embarrassed for the other side’s lawyers.

[faqt]

Interesting, Cable companies wanting to see how much UOIP will be asking for (the CB Capital valuation) in damages.

Judge won't allow it

Unless I missed something

long UOIP