Replies to post #129579 on Amfil Technologies Inc (FUNN)

[nighthawk285]

I'm not getting in the middle of the fight here, but from other audits I've been involved in (as a shareholder), what Roger is saying about having to have the footnotes and the disclaimers and everything else perfect before RSBM will sign off on it is pretty standard IMO. I'm sure you have too, whether it's taken this long or not....eh....not for me to say.

I will say though that I did a little digging on this CFO Squad....figured I'd see if they were legit, and FWIW, they don't seem to be a rinky-dink kind of operation. They're a pretty big outsourcing accounting firm. Average salary is $180k, with the top earners being $240k+, and quite a large clientele base for companies across the US.

https://www.google.com/search?q=the+cfo+squad&rlz=1C1CAFB_enUS727US727&oq=the+cf&aqs=chrome.0.69i59j69i57j69i61j69i60j0l2.1167j1j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

https://www.cfosquad.com

http://www.healthcarefinancenews.com/press-release/cfo-squad-launched-answer-demand-high-level-outsourced-financial-and-accounting

https://www.paysa.com/salaries/the-cfo-squad

[cwhockey31]

Yeah no shit - Roger has to "engage" them to adhere to independence standards.

My guess is it's a more complex footnote that isn't an easy one to format, and it needs too much work for the audit firm to provide guidance on.

The CFO Squad will recognize it quickly, make the updates with Roger, and it will be back on the auditors desk today/tomorrow. It shouldn't take long to review.