News Focus
News Focus
icon url

wbmw

10/12/06 6:52 PM

#33929 RE: chipguy #33928

Re: The guy who brought us peterwatts has now invented peterbytes

I don't know what's more idiotic. The fact that pgerassi doesn't know what the $*&^ he's talking about, or that other people actually believe his tripe.
icon url

Tenchu

10/12/06 6:55 PM

#33930 RE: chipguy #33928

Chipguy, > The guy who brought us peterwatts has now invented peterbytes

And his post already have 5 recommendations so far.

No doubt Barcelona is going to be a great chip, but K8 is due for a refresh anyway. Yet the 'Droids are masters of convincing themselves that AMD can walk on water.

By the way, Pete is also trying to convince me that HyperTransport would be a better memory interface than FBD:

http://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=22903785

Insane, isn't it?

Tenchu
icon url

Wouter Tinus

10/12/06 11:06 PM

#33936 RE: chipguy #33928

Even the basic assumtion of his calculation appears to be false, because according to this article* the L1I-cache bus is "160+ bits" (so over 20 bytes) wide. Is there a more definitive number in the public domain?

* http://www.realworldtech.com/page.cfm?ArticleID=RWT030906143144&p=4

That article also puts the average instruction lenght at ~4 bytes instead of ~4.8 bytes. And there is a buffer in between the cache and the decoders that loosens the coupling between fetch bandwidth and decode rate.

Anyway, I just wanted to add some technical arguments to the discussion instead of just pointing and laughing ;)