LOL!!! This gets funnier and more absurd by the moment. So you are saying it makes sense to sell an asset that assuming company executives are not liars is a monopoly and could generate $4.6MM+ a year in revenue for $10,500. And it makes sense because he is not an employee or director??? What the hell does that even mean?
So the shareholders of this company should not reap the benefit from this amazing asset but instead John Bordynuik personally get the benefit? I guess because he has not fleeced shareholders enough? On what planet does that make sense?
Now on the other hand if the data business is just a scam like the P2O business then I guess it really does not matter. Thoughts?
what i find amusing is the shattering of fake *news* .. it is crystal clear that the company's founder remains *involved* (besides being one of the company's largest shareholders) with P2O .. which is why so many original investors remain *invested* to this day ..
what matters now is what P2O does next ..
would be nice to see a 3rd BoD add .. to join the 2 adds from last October's surprise .. and the prelim date for the 2018 AGM .. filed in advance of what comes to pass with RC .. a many whose company was lauded for years here .. due to purchasing $millions of $s worth of a competitor's product ..
this sector is in its ascension .. and P2O/PTOI remains an OTC SURVIVOR in 2018 .. :)
Keep in mind that John is the only one who can make that system work as he designed it. If John isn't there the system is useless so if one the brainchildren here want to buy it go ahead. But you're buying something that you can't make work.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
