LOL!!! This gets funnier and more absurd by the moment. So you are saying it makes sense to sell an asset that assuming company executives are not liars is a monopoly and could generate $4.6MM+ a year in revenue for $10,500. And it makes sense because he is not an employee or director??? What the hell does that even mean?
So the shareholders of this company should not reap the benefit from this amazing asset but instead John Bordynuik personally get the benefit? I guess because he has not fleeced shareholders enough? On what planet does that make sense?
Now on the other hand if the data business is just a scam like the P2O business then I guess it really does not matter. Thoughts?