News Focus
News Focus
icon url

magikalalpha

02/28/18 3:05 PM

#107663 RE: jrf30 #107661

Roger is aware of my feelings on the question of the audit and viability of unsubstantiated numbers. I would not expect anyone to invest their money in anything I am doing based solely on my say-so.
If a mistake is made, it is carried forward into all subsequent statements if it is included in the balance sheet. The income and expenses items will only cover the respective periods. This will of course affect the equity, but the problem will not be compounded if the item cost is not fixed.
icon url

FastMny

02/28/18 3:14 PM

#107670 RE: jrf30 #107661

Agree Jrf. The unaudited fins are certainly real. In fact, no company that has intention of inflating numbers voluntarily commissions an audit. Furthermore, the audit is close from Roger's POV. If not, you wouldn't submit an uplist request to OTC Markets.

Audits take time. POT? has taken over a year and still has no audit. Yet, that stock has increased in value significantly. ONC? has recently publicly back tracked on their ability to complete their audit.

I believe Roger is honest and shareholder friendly. As a result I believe the audit will be posted literally any day.

At the end of the day we are invested in leadership. If you are comfortable with leadership than you hold. If you aren't you sell.

It's easy. Many here have watched this company grow exponentially over the last year. That doesn't happen by chance.
icon url

Russ777

02/28/18 3:17 PM

#107674 RE: jrf30 #107661

Yes, that is quite a contradiction.