Somehow SIAF is the most elaborate, clever and intricate scam there ever was, while at the same time being the most stupid and obvious... How it is possible to be all these at the same time is beyond me, but appearantly it is.
Also, there is no fasilities whatsoever, and at the same time undercurrentnews' article at the fasilities prove they don't know what they are doing. I don't understand how you can have both, but I guess I ain't street smart...
It is strange though, that the most complex explanation should be the correct one (one have to disregard all eye-witnesses, third-parties, pictures, videoes, newsarticles, DD by ECAB, D'Alessandro and others, etc to say it's a scam), when there is a very easy explanation that fits all evidence (an over-eager CEO with a reckless approach to finances, and also a bit of bad luck/bad timing).
I'm still waiting for someone to provide a single shred of evidence behind the claim that SIAF is a scam. Hopefully Solomon will start to deliver soon so that we don't have to suffer from both BS and a low PPS.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
