Without knowing the history of the case, I have no opinion. But generally speaking, I don't think the cops should be allowed to do whatever they want, obviously.
So you want to blame Obama for this? Well lets see. n 2004 defendant Jones was suspected of drug trafficking. Police investigators asked for and received a warrant to attach a GPS tracking device to the underside of the defendant's car but then exceeded the warrant's scope in both geography and length of time. The Supreme Court justices voted unanimously that this was a "search" under the Fourth Amendment, although they were split 5-4 as to the fundamental reasons behind that conclusion. The majority held that by physically installing the GPS device on the defendant's car, the police had committed a trespass against Jones' "personal effects" – this trespass, in an attempt to obtain inforhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Jones_%282012%29mation, constituted a search per se.
Last I looked Obama is retired and Trump is president.
Frustrated and Defiant, Trump Reshapes U.S. Immigration By MICHAEL D. SHEAR and JULIE HIRSCHFELD DAVIS
The changes have had far-reaching consequences, both for the immigrants who have sought to make a new home in the U.S. and for America’s image in the world. Behind closed doors, President Trump berated senior advisers, angered that the influx of foreigners was making a mockery of his campaign pledge.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
