I have a position here but haven’t been following lately However i do know that the intention of those involved with the deal were approaching such to compliment their game plan of “building the right kind of mj venture” from the ground up and to secure a quality product to market after (in their view) important legal issues were settled once and for all first. For a sustained mj business to have a chance branding legislation in California was paramount and some of the individuals involved in the plan that became kget, were very active in the NORMAL movement, have experience in mj legislation and see “branding” as the only true hedge against big tobacco or other corporate control of the Californias mj future. Thus ...no better brand than humbolt and pacific growers. The business strategy looked solid and appealing to die hard advocates like myself and many beloved growers who have paid their dues and are seasoned veterans of the legalization process of mj However when the stock dumped a few months ago there was much speculation as to why but no one could really pin it down and speculation was rampant. It could have been a shakeout for a buyback. I stayed on board for kicks mainly to see how it played out and it looks like it could get real interesting very soon. There has been steady accumulation recently. If branding legislation can be secured and contrary to popular belief the business plan is healthier than we realize we could be in for a real suprize and it will be a huge win for many grassroots mj ventures and a template for years to come for mj upstarts. Glta. Jmo.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
